Someone wants to be killed and eaten. they express desire for this for over a year, and then finally upload an explicit consent to be killed and eaten by a second party. They go through with this. Should the second party be legally prosecuted?
Conversation
Replying to
"consent = only necessary condition" is a low resolution political theory
downstream consequences of state sanctioned cannibalism
2
1
32
Show replies
Replying to
Yes it’s like bears, once they get a taste for blood they won’t stop at one, they need to be put down 🔫
7
Replying to
I’d say no, but only if we have full certainty that the eaten person acted freely and under no coercion whatsoever. How can you guarantee that?
2
4
Replying to
It’s almost hard to judge, it depends on what the laws are where both parties live. I don’t think the person who kills and eats the first person should be charged for it. But I feel like it’s such a grey area...
2
1
