first blog post in over a year i just angrily pooped out
Conversation
Replying to
The reason why race and genital size may not be correlated is because correlation is not necessarily transitive.
If X correlates with Y and Y correlates with Z, then this does not imply X correlates with Z.
terrytao.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/whe
Quote Tweet
QUIZ. Here is another statistical error by IQ-Eugenists. Show the magnitude of the error (bounds on correlation)
Show this thread
1
Replying to
The only correlation I know of is the ring finger, where if it's longer than the index finger. But the sample pool is only 12 guys lol
Replying to
Fascinating! Some sort of double-blind study with lots of subjects and several independent observers is needed.
Replying to
Everything that have with race to do is taboo. Especially when you combine it with sex and gender. No one want to touch the poo. My personal guess is that it correlates with hight and a healthy childhood. And as you write is hight something that differs between the races.
1
Replying to
In terms of the human body, "taller" is nearly synonymous with "larger," and a tall person is expected to have larger body parts than a short person.
Why wouldn't this apply to the penis as well? Seems like common sense.
2
Replying to
animals from warmer regions generally evolve more elongated extremeties because the increased surface area allows for better heat management
2
Replying to
random but interesting: I heard in a documentary the first study to ever measure average sizes of parts of vulvae (labia minorae, openings of the vagina) was done 2018
1
2
Replying to
Who cares? Even if it was empirically conclusive one way or the other, so what? Don’t really see what’s so “fascinating” about it from a race perspective.
1