This is true! But, not necessarily unwise. A society that doesn't value "protecting the children" highly (perhaps, above all) is a society with an expiration date.https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1425593024826920960 …
-
-
First of all, yikes, new nightmare I am speaking in very general terms, and yes, a certain amount of risk and danger is healthy. But I think the Apple case is more complex than that (if that is indeed what you were referring to).
-
I wasn't, I was referring to people trying to take down Onlyfans, which has the most rigorous age verification I've ever seen on a sex website, because protect the kids
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
idk if this is cope or whatever but to me that seems less like a "protecting the children vs. not protecting the children" case as a tradeoff between protecting children from a very rare and bad threat (hitting their head on the rocks) vs. one that does more *overall* damage...
-
...because it's more common (the psychological damage of not being allowed to do anything potentially dangerous)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.