Nothing? Spectrums have ends
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean isn't it the same way there's no way anything can statistically be 100%? Ie. it'll always be "at most" 99% manly/womanly or something. But that then brings the issue of everyone defines it differently so idk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It isn’t!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe "ultra-men and infra-women" or "ultra-women and infra-men" need to figure out the frequencies first.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Horseshoe theory, you loop back around
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gender is not based on anything meaningfully consistent enough to be able to answer the question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Naomi Wu
-
Yeah, hyper-femme gender presentation isn't a discussion most Westerners are ready for. Hyper-masc they can cope with without shrieking with intrasexual agression.pic.twitter.com/PTsPw2pirp
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If gender is a spectrum, and it’s unethical to deny trans people the hormones to get their body to align with their minds, then I need testosterone therapy now since I identify as a more muscular man than I am now. H/t
@SwipeWright for being early on this argument -
Yeah that seems fine. Morphological freedom and the freedom to put whatever you want in your body seem good in general not just with trans people.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.