Don't have enough information and since I can blame it on the CCP either way, I'm not super invested in the answer.
-
-
-
This is the correct response. It either came from the lab (either on accident, or semi-accident, or intentionally), which is ultimately on the CCP. Or the CCP didn't know and reflexively shut people up, destroyed possible evidence, and refused investigation. Also CCP's fault.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Both?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am undecided at this point. 6 months ago, I would have said Zoonotic. Now with the latest inquiries and China being... well China with sharing information. I'll wait for science to further investigate.
-
It's not mostly a scientific question at his point. It's an investigative/fact finding question. Something for detective work and real journalism. There are people alive who know the truth. The question is whether it can be documented, substantiated, and disseminated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There’s way too much *potential* evidence pointing one way to ignore the possibility of a lab leak. Are we really supposed to believe a virus just popped up out of nowhere within a matter of a few months and brought the entire world to a standstill for over a year?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the lab wouldve come up w something way worse than this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Confession: I really don't like this sort of poll because it binarizes uncertainty. I would love a version of this poll that used probabilities. E.g., odds came from a lab <10%, 10-50%, 50-90%, >90%. Cheers!
-
This, and also why not a combination of both? It could've been zoonotic initially, then researched at the lab.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.