Conversation

Lots of people in my mentions saying stuff like this. No, I actually was an escort and spent waaaay more hours than you actually talking to men about the circumstances that brought them here, and then having sex with them. Did you consider *asking me* if your theory is correct? t.co/uvp6hEUTP1
This Tweet is unavailable.
3
95
1. No, most - i'd say 80% had meaningful interest beyond the physicality. Some men *didn't have sex with me*. About 10% wanted sex but were uniquely interested in the personality, spent 90% of the time talking.
2
26
2. lots of men who weren't interested in my personality at all, also weren't aggressive at all. Lots were subby. Lots were shy. Some were sexually inexperienced and wanted to learn. I had a few self-conscious virgins.
3
46
Replying to
yeah, true. I guess maybe I was failing to account for the virgins specifically? Cause I knew that going in, and so something around registering a transformation was offline. But the subby *still* is unrecognisable sex creature, imo
2
1
Replying to and
like, something about the transformation is hard to explain. It's not *just* aggression, though that's a great way to characterize it. It's something like, mannerisms and the way they move their body, and speak, changes; the script drops off, they become graspy
1
1
Replying to
no good thoughts. maybe women don't get 'taken over' by horny the same way men do? I suspect this is true of myslef; I've been 'taken over' by horny only a handful of times in my life and I imagine maybe that happens to men every time? 2. context? women viewed as more sexual?