Conversation

I'm pretty libertarian, and open to discussion around it; I've updated my views before and acknowledge there are weaknesses. But most people responding on twitter are making arguments based on significant misunderstanding or straw men of my libertarianism views.
23
269
There are some good points against libertarianism, but "if we stop governament programs nothing could possibly full that role better" is not one of them. It's the equivalent of christians going "but without god, there's no reason to do good" - it's basic and a bit ignorant.
13
177
And again, to clearly reiterate - I'm not saying there aren't good arguments against libertarianism out there! But by and large, most of the people in my mentions seem to be stuck on level 1 understanding and critique and it's pretty frustrating.
18
145
Replying to
I think when free markets fail to provide goods/opportunities to people who need them, it is an appropriate use of government power. For example, without Medicaid, there doesn’t seem to be much of a supply (charitable, volunteer, etc) of healthcare services for poor people.
1
4
Possibly. But the first step is to ask whether it's free markets that "fail" in the first place. This is usually not true. We do not have a free market in health care, so you can't lay blame for the ills of health care entirely at the feet of the market.
2
1
Agreed. Consider the areas of the economy people complain about most: health care, education, housing. These are the areas in which govt involvement is greatest. It's not a great track record. As the author says, nobody complains about chairs. Nobody complains about clothing.