Conversation

Replying to
I'm unclear on this. I don't know enough to be sure it's not, but I know enough to know that the tech it's potentially offering is something that would be extremely useful, and it would be more profitable to not be a scam.
3
5
Replying to
im kinda a noob so pls educate me but: 1 doesn't seem too crazy to me? there's an active otc market and not-listed-on-exchanges-yet seems kinda normal 2 im less clear on. i personally haven't spent a cent on bitclout, but i was auto verified 3 are there any benefits to that
3
1
Replying to
I don't know enough to know if there's a clear response to this. I do know there's reasons why people make blockchains besides just using tokens on eth, but I'm unclear if there's a good reason for this or not.
1
1
Replying to
I’m guessing it’s more “we don’t know if it’s technically a blockchain, and even if it is, having a blockchain on one computer only removes all the benefits”
2
3
Replying to
ok this makes more sense for me would we expect to start seeing a ... slowdown? if more transactions take place on one or a few computers? what is the impact on a blockchain if the processing power is more limited?
Replying to
so the issue isn’t processing power, but consensus and transparency if there aren’t other nodes validating the work, they could be doing anything they want to change bitclout transactions
4
Replying to and
That would be the least of the issues with their setup. The larger possibility is that from one day to the other Bitclout disappears and people lose money or source of income by having the rug pulled from under their feet.
3