Conversation

I'll be in a live-streamed debate tomorrow where myself and the opponent switch views; I think women should have rights, but I'll be arguing that they shouldn't.

Quote Tweet

Break The Rules (Sub to breaktherules.tv)

@breakth3rules

Mar 24, 2021

Tomorrow Thurs @ 5 PM EDT, @Aella_Girl & @giantgio debate women's rights in reverse (Aella against / Gio for)!

Set Reminder + SUBSCRIBE!

youtu.be/hBOt3gYHB8E Ft. @default_friend @vers_laLune @AgainPorco @Levpo @JulesPhamilton

patreon.com/breakth3rules

122

Replying to

I don't mean to be sh-tty, I really enjoy your posts, but why have a "reverse debate?" I wouldn't argue for right-wing positions and policies if you paid me. F-ck them and f-ck that! Oh, well, do what you like, I quess.

Aella

@Aella_Girl

Replying to

@RDWALKER1

The idea is, if you can't thoroughly inhabit your opponent's point of view, then you don't fully understand your own; or rather, you're operating in ignorance of an opposing view instead of an integration of it.

5:28 AM · Mar 25, 2021

Replying to

I appreciate your point I'm just pretty sure I wouldn't be comfortable doing it regardless of everything else. But that's just me. Have fun and good luck.

Replying to

By the way, one quick question: Could you exetend that to the Holocaust? To slavery? To murder? Just a thought.