Conversation

I'll be in a live-streamed debate tomorrow where myself and the opponent switch views; I think women should have rights, but I'll be arguing that they shouldn't.
Quote Tweet
Tomorrow Thurs @ 5 PM EDT, @Aella_Girl & @giantgio debate women's rights in reverse (Aella against / Gio for)! 🔔 Set Reminder + SUBSCRIBE! ▶ youtu.be/hBOt3gYHB8E Ft. @default_friend @vers_laLune @AgainPorco @Levpo @JulesPhamilton 💸 patreon.com/breakth3rules 💸
Image
Replying to
I don't mean to be sh-tty, I really enjoy your posts, but why have a "reverse debate?" I wouldn't argue for right-wing positions and policies if you paid me. F-ck them and f-ck that! Oh, well, do what you like, I quess.
3
2
Replying to
The idea is, if you can't thoroughly inhabit your opponent's point of view, then you don't fully understand your own; or rather, you're operating in ignorance of an opposing view instead of an integration of it.
2
12
Show replies
Replying to
In the western world, there are no rights a woman doesnt have that a man has. They have more rights in places like family court, or courts in general, as their sentencing is far more favorable to them due to them having a vagina. Sex/gender wars=divide and conquer.
1
Replying to
On the one hand, the Intellectual Turing Test format sounds very interesting. On the other hand, I expect that at some point some jokester will listen to their opponent lay out their case, then on their turn simply concede.
1