Some do when they turn 18 and evict them
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Like post-birth? Fuck no.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No but would support publically funded total care for such people so that parents weren't on the hook to care for them their entire lives.
-
Care for those who cannot live unassisted should definitely be accessible if euthanasia isn't available. And also if it is.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This should also be a valid reason for abortion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Either I'm misreading the question, the majority of other respondents are misreading the question or else I am very much surprised by these preliminary results.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jesus, the current results of this poll are darker than I expected. But given the number of disabled people who are just warehoused by family, I probably shouldn’t have been surprised.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyone who votes "Yes", beyond the obvious moral dilemma, should consider the precedent this would set and the slippery slope that would follow.
-
Exactly my concern and the reason I voted no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.