body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

so some people wanted a term for being attracted to "opposite gender, opposite genitals", and called it superstraight. the internet, of course, reacted very reasonably, did not proceed to call them horrific transphobes, and reaffirmed any sexual preference is valid. ....right?

21

9

195

Stalemateable Čhepulis • • •

Replying to

It still looks more like a joke than a real thing.

2

15

Replying to

a lot of it is pretty trolly yeah, but not all of it is

11:01 PM · Mar 6, 2021

Stalemateable Čhepulis • • •

Replying to

I'm not denying that there's a common sentiment. It's this particular effort that's a bit meh. I'm also a little weary of the colors. As much as i love them, black&orange is what russian conservatives use as their symbol (derived from the st. George stripes). Could be their op.

1