Well actually fuck the nyt. I felt roughly neutral about them but now that I saw them write about a topic I'm deeply familiar with I realize how actually inaccurate and misrepresenting and unethical they are.
157
373
4,780
Conversation
If you wanna read without giving them traffic
Quote Tweet
Replying to @CadeMetz
reminder that its bad on purpose to make you click
and if you must read the piece you can do so here without generating page views
archive.is/0Ghdl
Replying to
Conversation about the piece drives engagement much more strongly than the click itself.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
like 50 people have said gell-mann effect at me today thank you
it's *not even the gell-man effect* tho
2
Replying to
It was a hit piece. And the reason the blog disappeared has a reason the article chooses not to give on purpose. The article doesn't give it because not stating it invites you to draw your own conclusions that are far less charitable to Slate Star Codex than the actual... 1/?
1
Show more replies