Polyandry without the emotional attachment and with no co-habitation
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So *that’s* why California banned non-compete clauses!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
aren't kids like implicit exclusivity? you don't get much time and energy for other stuff anyway
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that would be the weirdest and coldest parental relationship. It’s like agreeing to be divorced from day one, and there’s a whole host of problems made from divorce.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If that's what marriage means to you then your conception of marriage is completely and totally broken.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This wouldn't include raising the child, but you could be a surrogate. I overheard a surrogate talking with the check-in person at one of my prenatal appointments recently.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, surrogate + nanny? Probably legal, but what would be the target demographic?
-
We're talking wealthy men who have a very strong desire (you suggested $1M?) for genetic offspring, but are incapable of forming any relationship long enough to have kids (and comfy with this fact), and don't have much interest in *raising* kids. And believe a kid needs their mom
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.