If I shot someone who wanted to be shot because he thought it would be funny, that would be immoral even if I laughed after.
-
-
-
What the fuck am I talking about?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Love this question. My kneejerk thought is yes but I am having trouble coming up with an example. Hmm.
-
I think it boils down to the fact that "feeling good" about something in the moment may not mean it's actually good for you (either in the moment or long term). E.g.: 30 year old and 13 year old in a romantic relationship.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think you have to specify the time horizons at which the parties would approve the action In the general case, I think general opinion would be the horizon has to be infinite Perhaps even including “hypothetical sober versions” or etc of the parties
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lying and deceit are the immoral/all-happy acts in my mind. "Victimless crimes," in which participants have full knowledge, are

-
full knowledge *and the capability to make use of that knowledge. Important re: minors, mentally ill people, dementia patients etc..
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Good point. But wouldn't other stakeholders (society, neighbours etc not be?)
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We are essentially intuition-driven information processors, constantly scanning the world around us, morally interpreting information and colouring narratives with our unique worldview. Your feedback would be invaluable!https://medium.com/curious/does-eating-dog-make-you-a-liberal-dfa3ceb4c3af …
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.