Conversation

You know that feeling when you change your mind, going from being inside one worldview to moving into another? That sensation is fantastic for thinking in general; if you can fluidly move between "believing" and "not believing" two sides to a debate, it can help clarify a lot.
12
294
And I don't mean straw-man believing, like "I can imagine those people being idiots". I mean actually handling the issue with the sensation of being inside it, like it's yours, like it *makes sense* to see it from your point of view. A little part of you has to actually buy in.
NFT profile picture
Replying to
I've started doing that more and more this year, with greater effect. When I first recognized I was doing it I was afraid I'd lost sight of the shore in my adventure to see other points of view, but it's become a fascinating practice I'm glad to have developed
Replying to
I struggle with the consequences whenever I do these reflections since a part of me has to buy in, I feel like my convictions are not very strong, and then I go down the rabbit hole of double/triple checking my assumptions. Exhausting.
Replying to
I think this becomes more natural the more creative you are at fleshing out the narrative landscape of others' lifes, in general. The more you can see, smell/ recreate the sensory inputs of that person's world, like starring in the movie of their life, you believe them
2
Replying to
I know exactly what you mean. I think it’s unfortunate that this is even necessary. But it is. Beliefs often become integral to our own identity. This causes us to see them and defend them with a charity we could never muster were we to just view them as a claim to be examined.
Replying to
Most of you are too young for his early work, but David Kelley, in shows like LA Law and Picket Fences, made a point of writing utterly convincing arguments on both sides of numerous issues. I suspect he chose issues where he could have this experience.