I'm against clearing homeless out of parks given we live in a world where standards of living in between "homeless" and "a properly zoned/fully inspected building" are illegal.
Like, someone could buy a plot of land, build a bunch of tent-sized pods and rent these to live in for a tiny fraction of the price of normal housing. But despite this being an upgrade from homelessness, ppl would see it and go "wow that's inhumane, we can't allow this"
Often, when homeless people are cleared from parks, they are given living options safer than tent cities.
Of the many things that affect homelessness on a large scale, building health and safety standards isn't one of them.
We can reduce homelessness without this compromise.
maybe this is the case in some cities, but not the ones I've paid attention to. I used to be friends with homeless people back in Seattle and that was not the way they understood how homeless relocation worked
I have no clue about Seattle.
Regarding LA where I'm located, I would agree that many (especially the more vocal) homeless people may not perceive there to be better options even when those options do exist.
Treating mental illness in a stable living environment is hard enough.