body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

rationalist and rat-adjacent girls aren't bad, only problem is there's like 7 of them

4:02 AM · Dec 10, 2020

Replying to

and

So rat-adjacent is short for rationalist adjacent I'm assuming? reddit.com/r/SneerClub/co

Replying to

and

Bingo. I was going to say "hang out in science circles", but then the ratios are terrible

1

(what does "parody" mean, exactly?)

@CoughsOnWombats

Replying to

and

Some of them are poly, though, which I imagine helps. (Not a realistic option for me, given where I live, but I imagine the actual dynamics aren't *quite* as bad for this as a surface reading of the statistics might suggest.)