To be fair that’s how 95% of the world reaches their moral conclusions.
-
-
-
Then 95% of the world is wrong. ...that explains a lot actually.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's the alternative to moral intuition? The "do-no-harm" principle has become popular in the last few decades and has been pursued ad absurdum—as long as what you're doing hurts no one but yourself, go ahead—but in the end, nothing but intuition justifies that either.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your subjective experience of the world is governed by emotions, intuitions and human bias. Embracing them into your worldview allows for a more harmonious existence where you're less 'mind' and more 'person'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah questioning moral intuition is pretty valuable I think, even if you don't change your position at the end. Always good to evaluate your personal biases and where they come from.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Idk, I think the strong disgust is a very good guide. Everything is logically assailable and I just think the arguments against it that anyone could make with a few minutes of thought outweigh the ones for it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Using Consent as a baseline, then yes it's wrong. Unless there was some contract between two people prior to the deceased passing that decreed consent, then we can conclude it's wrong.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.