when i was an escort, there was a slight (r=0.2) negative correlation (p=0.1) between the likelihood that I had an orgasm and the physical attractiveness of my client.
i like the idea of playing around with narratives explaining these things, but yeah the p-hacky stuff is what i had in mind
heuristic: if you have a ton of data and notice patterns between some variables, then mayyybe you're just the kind of person who is good at data/patterns
This is true! I usually am much more careful around p-hacking, but I have an emotional attachment to this - it's what I recorded the data to find out in the first place and is the first correlation I checked