when i was an escort, there was a slight (r=0.2) negative correlation (p=0.1) between the likelihood that I had an orgasm and the physical attractiveness of my client.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Aella_Girl
how many of these potential correlations did you run tho?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xobnu
On my orgasm likelihood? Maybe 3-4. I know p-hacking is a risk here
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Aella_Girl
i like the idea of playing around with narratives explaining these things, but yeah the p-hacky stuff is what i had in mind heuristic: if you have a ton of data and notice patterns between some variables, then mayyybe you're just the kind of person who is good at data/patterns
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
This is true! I usually am much more careful around p-hacking, but I have an emotional attachment to this - it's what I recorded the data to find out in the first place and is the first correlation I checked
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.