My theory is that unattractive clients tried harder than attractive ones
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So ugly sex is slightly better sex?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how many of these potential correlations did you run tho?
-
On my orgasm likelihood? Maybe 3-4. I know p-hacking is a risk here
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The pretty boys didn't have to try as hard. The ugly guys probably thought they owed you something.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
does this hold true at the tails of the distribution ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was r=0.2 or r=-0.2? The sign of r determines directionality. The p-value has nothing* to do with the strength or direction of the result, just the likelihood it’s a true result.
-
It was -.2, I forgot to include negative sign. I also know how r and p values work, I'm starting to get offended when ppl try to explain them to me for the millionth time. Like do you think I just threw those numbers in there for fun?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Attractive and unattractive clients are paying for different things.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.