body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Absolutely true. And if the husband is going to cheat, it's better to do it with a contained, safe sex worker who is std tested regularly. Way lower chance of her "stealing" the husband away, and the husband gets a sexual outlet so he's less likely to leave the marriage! twitter.com/default_friend

This Tweet is unavailable.

49

205

237

For a lot of marriages, the husband cheating with a sex worker is the only thing keeping the marriage together

47

163

185

⋆₊⁺⋆ boi of moon ⋆⁺₊⋆

Replying to

"only thing" is a bit weird here. If that were the case maybe the marriage shouldn't stay together. But maybe you meant "necessary part of", in which case ✅

1

12

Replying to

and

Okay sure yes, necessary part of is bet

12:09 AM · Nov 23, 2020