1/
So, @IshitaChandel1 is lying about a paper to get it retracted by saying it links whiteness to intelligence. This is a lie. The paper makes no such claim, and in fact doesn even hint at such a claim.pic.twitter.com/3B2AaJtuGE
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yes. I got hounded by colleagues and students at my university said they felt "unsafe" because I published an op-ed in the @WSJ saying essentially that "male and female are real biological categories and denying that reality can cause harm in some contexts to some groups."
As a biologist, pointing out that biological sex is real is perhaps the least scientifically controversial thing I can imagine.
Every group is, and most individuals are. That's partly why we conduct research with an unnatural process like the scientific method. But yes, the woke, and most of the left in general, are humongous science deniers wrt things like IQ, evopsych and individual/group differences.
The wokes are anti science about a lot of different things, of course. They legit do think the notion of objectivity is a tool of oppression and thus suspect or just straight up white supremacy. It's a Manichean cult fighting a world suffused with evil.
Unfortunately I think we already know the answer...
Yes, they are.
This is a complicated question, so the technical answer is in the DMs
If possible I’m curious to know the answer.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.