Women in science need to learn more about how statistics work. If I published results this low in significance as tho they were real I could have 'proved' eighty different insane things by now. To explain why this is bad:https://twitter.com/EmilyKhazan/status/1323292996062842883 …
-
-
I'm getting the impression you might need to clarify what you said and start over, either that or your sample size of "women in science" is super small, which is to your point ironic that you'd suggest that. I know dozens of women, in my field alone, who are good at stats.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.