Women in science need to learn more about how statistics work. If I published results this low in significance as tho they were real I could have 'proved' eighty different insane things by now. To explain why this is bad:https://twitter.com/EmilyKhazan/status/1323292996062842883 …
-
-
That’s a pretty flexible definition of irony. Did you mean sarcastic or condescending? I mean, all good. Love your polls and would love to see one of your scientific papers. But given the amount of bs men pull in science this ain’t it for me.
-
I view "women in science" to be one of the topics more likely to suffer from... Well, bad science, due to how heavily politicized it is. I view women in science as extremely good, but have more negative priors for women who talk about women in science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.