Women in science need to learn more about how statistics work. If I published results this low in significance as tho they were real I could have 'proved' eighty different insane things by now. To explain why this is bad:https://twitter.com/EmilyKhazan/status/1323292996062842883 …
-
-
They are training people to search out results based on ideology and what can be marketed rather than what is likely true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The end goal of many is not truth, but vaguely plausible support for their propaganda.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Honest question: if you acknowledge that the effect isn't statistically significant, why do you report having found a bias?
- Show replies
-
-
-
It's Critical Social Justice related, I bet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think to some degree they know it's not okay, but journalistic ethics are abandoned in favour of narrative at an increasingly common rate. It happens all the time, claims about sex/race inequality while only looking at one variable. Never asking why, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.