I think it depends what you mean by “marriage” if the restriction of the other person’s sexuality is not part of the package. Marriage is an institution that is in part there for society, for children, it’s not just a contract between two individuals.https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1320070543375167489 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @kaschuta
you know poly people have long-term successful marriages with kids, right? Restricting sexuality came out of the issues of pregnancy, which would def hurt preexisting kids, but today this is no longer an issue, and you can both commit to kids and express yourself sexually.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Aella_Girl
I’m sure there are many such cases. But the issue remains that the goals of poly as poly are related to individual self-actualization, and the goals of traditional marriage are collective. A two parent home is still the best thing we have for the next generation.
2 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @kaschuta @Aella_Girl
I think grandma is a bit different to a polycule both in genetic investment and commitment.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Yeah but we're starting a liiiitle more nitpicky? With other stuff like adopted parents and inlaws we can see good commitment without genetic, and married polycules often have greater commitment than grandma does. Even so "group raises child" seems mostly categorically fine.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.