Sjws claim they value black voices, but I've seen them dismiss too many dissenting black voices for me to believe it. It seems more accurate to say they value "agreeing" black voices, and they revoke validity of blackness (e.g., "self-hating") as a punishment for disagreement.
Conversation
Replying to
SJWs leans heavily on trying to abuse agreement and conformity into people, it's very reminiscent of the witch hunts or the red scare. It seems like society never got over its puritan roots, it just changed how that puritanism manifests.
1
1
13
Show replies
Replying to
Identity is a stand-in for thier conflict theory view of the world. They hold "oppressed" identities together in one aggrieved coalition with intersectionality. "Politically Black" just means politically useful. Same goes for politically female, gay, fat, disabled etc. It's ugly.
5
16
190
Show replies
Replying to
I suspect you would find it frustrating if you were judged according to the least admirable of those who share some of your points of view.
I value so much of what you say, but you seem to be painting with a larger and larger brush every week.
3
11
Replying to
They want a box of cupcakes where the frosting is all different colors, and all the same flavor.
5
5
82
Replying to
depends on context. if someone is acting against their own best interest than then ya its likely not to agree with them. also not agreeing with someone of color doesn't mean dismissing.
5
4
