Conversation

besides, the relevant point here is that if it is the case that circling institute practices a bad version of circling than judging circling based on the institute’s bad version both lacks nuance and sorta blinds you to potential benefits of good circling as practiced elsewhere
1
6
the biggest first shift for me was discovering rationality. being introduced to techniques on how to think more clearly really leveled me up a lot. The second shift was circling - specifically CE style surrendered leadership. It is *immensely* valuable to me
2
10
and it's also kinda hard to describe how in the same way it's hard to describe how rationality is useful on an intuitive or 'grokking' level. It gave me the ability to become much more aware and ongoingly accepting of myself in connection with others
1
5
also i am generally extremely allergic to all sort of hippie interpersonal feelings oriented stuff. I don't like authentic relating games, or anything structured, or any of those burn workshops where you feel into your body and pair up or whatever. I friggin hate that. willies.
1
6
in circles, i've told ppl i: hate them want to hurt them hate listening to them speak am bored am afraid of them don't trust them am revolted by them I've also: sobbed, a lot curled up into balls had intense horrifying facial spasms napped and it's all ok.
2
9
Show replies
yea i also wanna say I don't think circling is for everyone, some ppl just don't jive with it, get it, enjoy it, or learn from it, and that's totally fine - it's vaguely similar to psychedelics imo. but also interested in hearing the semi explanation
1
5
Show replies