For me personally, I consider prejudiced action to be 'bad' when it fails to update based on countering evidence, and 'fine' if it does update. SOME EXAMPLES:
that's a drastic oversimplification. Yes, stats can often be misleading - particularly when news outlets report on them. Do you think of men committing higher rates of physical assault on strangers as just "prejudice is okay"?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Anti-semitism's a good example, but I think the more obvious example here is black people. People use black crime rates as justification for anti-black prejudice and it seems like Aella's principle supports assuming black people are criminals until proven otherwise.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.