Your worldview is oriented around what you think is good; people who disagree will necessarily then be working for things you think are more harmful. "What you want is more harmful than what I want" is a basic function of disagreement and isn't an excuse to end discussion.
-
-
I agree with you to some extent, but I think there's an argument to be made that from an optics standpoint, sitting down and debating an idiot on an equal footing grants them a certain amount of legitimacy that may be harmful on net to society.
-
Allowing them to publicly state their views creates common knowledge which enables those with similar views to coordinate, creating a movement where one would otherwise have been unable to exist
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.