Not in any way the we can quantifiably view at this time
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
David Chalmers is that you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep, the sun is also.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they are then perhaps we shouldn't say "get your rocks off" anymore?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on if you actually work in geology for a living or not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only rocks that have been made into computers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On this topic, I’d like to present this fascinating read: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/why-life-does-not-really-exist/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean... Obviously. There's a whole show about fraggle rock.pic.twitter.com/f7AMQiZQ2u
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A steelman for this is that rocks could be components of a conscious being. Eg if you used rocks as bits in a computer where moving a rock changed a bit value. And you programmed a general AI that thinks by moving its rocks. Admittedly, this might not be what OP meant by option1.
-
We can enhance this argument to arrive at single rock being conscious. If a given arrangement of rocks can map to a consciousness, then why not an arrangement of molecules that randomly happens to move in exactly the same way as the rock consciousness? So only unlucky rocks!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.