This is common-place in normative philosophy and decision theory - if a theory is not self-recommending then that counts as substantial evidence against such theory
No but the thing I'm trying to get at is where a theory being not-self recommending is actually irrelevant to the point, and thus calling on that is a fallacy
-
-
oh hum I am having grouble conceptualizing this now - do you have an example to ground this better?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.