it just makes sense! amirite
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given that women are more successful at procreation wouldn’t this mean that on a long enough scale population would become heavily skewed female? Or would nature figure that out?
-
women arent more successful then men at procreation, on average
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I voted 'yes' based on the assumption that there would be less violence (fewer men and less competition over women). It's such a shame that I was assigned male at birth. /s
-
Wouldn't that result to more competition for men?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Male/yes but I’d skew it even more if I could
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Were I young enough that females about to be born would eventually be a part of my sexual pool, I would selfishly say yes. As they're not, I vote no and would go 55% male were the option present, just for the sake of promoting greater advances in a world that I mostly won't see.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
After all these polls I'm starting to feel like you're part of some vast data collection serv..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
change it FOREVER? so many unknown consequences
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.