What kind of monster doesn't end the spread of STIs with a button push?
-
-
-
er. sorry. i meant magically prevents STD spread *to the partner*; as in; the cheater is not risking their partner specifically by cheating.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What’s your answer,
@Aella_Girl ? -
My answer is that's none of my damn business, why would I interfere with their lives and karma?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't want cheaters to get away with it and be encouraged
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If humans were a monogamous species there would be no STDs: This as no means to vector.
-
Not necessarily true. Many STDs also spread through means other than sex. Of course they probably would no longer be called STDs, but the diseases could remain.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pregnancy is still an issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe in honesty and transparency, polyamory is fine in that context. Your button makes lying and lack of transparency ok, so No.
-
I disagree. Lying/cheating still isn't OK. The button just removes some of the consequences of doing so (which can also affect the non-cheating partner). Personally I would have one non-sexual primary plus paramours to stay STI free.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.