Clarifying: people get magically assigned 'bad' points (the more direct/intense the harm, the more points assigned). They also are magically assigned 'good' points according to same rules. The 'good' points are minused from the 'bad' points. Most bad points leftover loses.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Also assume you and your closest family/friends are exempt from this button.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this a % of all people, or only the "net negative" people?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I keep answering this and you keep remaking them..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Theoretical framework for "0" answer: - killing people very bad - past harms != future harms - killing past bad actors does not fix past harms - some % of past bad actors very likely to commit future harms - unconvinced magical button > due process/courts for figuring out that %
-
We’re not killing them though, we’re removing them from existence
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not that I'd pick it, but you should include the Thanos option: 50% gone, randomly. He was evil and yet too many today would side with him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Going over 20% would probably hit the point where food supply chains break down and we hit mass starvation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is the "worst" and "good" calculcated based on the button pressers morals, societies morals, each "perpetrators" own morals or each "victims" own morals? Some acts deemed harmful by some people are deemed perfectly acceptable by others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for making this poll
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.