The people who do the most good often do the most harm. This needs to be expressed as net harm imo.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the worst rise to the top then cutting off the worst 1% is the same as cutting off Hydra's heads.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many times do you keep pressing it?
-
Depending on the phrasing of the original question, no more than once or twice, since pressing the button means a direct, concrete harm on a great number of people. So the button would make you disappear as well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who does the ranking?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it is better to try to identify what factors allowed those people to cause so much harm and address those, rather than just kill the people. There seems to be a trend in writing people off as unsalvageable or evil and I don't think that's reasonable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder about the correlation with yes here and the support of the death penalty
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would like to think that I’d actively work to dismantle this system if it existed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The plot twist is, since the memory of those people’s existence is dulled, you are compelled to press the button again and again, always erasing 1% of the “bad people”, until no one is left. Now timking about it, it’s like making a error, just to forget it and make it again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.