Conversation

A huge problem when talking about law is that *cultural* law is super important. You can put different cultures into the same legal system and get wildly different results. Some cultures would do great if released from government; others would fall apart.
Replying to
I'm beginning to think you think way too much about too many marginally meaningful or important things at least from my perspective. I didn't take a ton of acid just to think about this earthly plane you know. I wanted to know about the mysteries of creation and eternity
3
Replying to
What is a culture? If a culture falls apart if you release it from government is there truly a culture? And is culture something that can fall apart? Isn't culture a universal thing shared by a group of people, and in itself a form of government
1
1
Replying to
The causality runs both ways. If you create a legal system that rewards a certain culture, you'll get more of it than you would otherwise. By shrinking government, you encourage an independent culture.
Replying to
No, they wouldn't. Less coercion leads to wealthier society, wealth is the base for civility. Government is a decivilizing agent, it can't be nothing else since is based on stealing (taxation), that is a decivilizing action.