Totally, and it would be cruel no to do it
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So tricky. Such a beautiful culture and language has grown up around deafness - but passively denying a child the joy of sounds feels wrong, maybe cruel
-
What if the injection could ensure deafness to perpetuate the culture?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The less legal requirements the government is able to force upon us the better
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is dystopian af
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Forcing it upon people is morally wrong but letting your child be deaf may also be morally wrong.
-
Exactly my stance. Voted no. I think the mother is morally obligated to get the shot. I think forcing the mother to get the shot is wrong. The moment we do, we have to ask "who chooses what is required and how is it determined" and it starts to get real messy real fast.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm flabbergasted that 51% of people got this wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why would someone vote for No?
-
If something is good for people, you don't have to force it upon them. They'll choose it out of self-interest.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.