Whenever I hear people saying they have a "right to free x service" I imagine them holding a gun to the person who has to do the work to provide them that service.
55
82
586
Conversation
Replying to
Or you can provide public funding to pay people to do that work, and they do it voluntarily as a result, no guns required.
(of course that requires taxation so ultimately guns are still involved)
2
12
Replying to
yea i just view it as pointing a gun at someone with money and saying "Pay that worker to give me this service or else I shoot"
isn't this obviously completely different from what you said originally? pointing a gun at the government to force them to pay a doctor to treat people doesn't carry the kneejerk disgust that pointing a gun at a doctor does by any stretch
1
1
Except as a taxpayer that money is yours and your gun is your vote.
Here's the thing...it seems someone's pointing a gun at society and saying take it if you can.
Well fuck it ..if the gun has to be involved, I think I'll be the one holding it.