People are mad at this, but I don't understand. The results feel like a great argument for (at least some level of) autism. If people *with* autism are much more likely to prefer it continue than people without, then this strikes me as a great pro-autism argument.https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1249457302538608640 …
-
-
I understand the difference in intention. But the replies said something else. I know you dont control where an audience takes a question like this, but thats where it seems they took it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Asking from a place of unknowing, should it not be expected that some autistic people would take your hypothetical very literally and practically, especially that it threatens the primal fear of non-existence, in positing that they would not exist as they know themselves?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
She doesn’t care at all. Aella’s raison d’être is to ask offensive questions for the sole purpose of allowing bigots to comment on them and thereby, idk, science or some shit?
It’s despicable and that’s why she’s ‘famous’.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.