I want to see how much different things affect income - ethnicity, appearance, enjoyment of the job, etc. Safe sex is because my hypothesis was most escorts practice safe sex and I wanted to see if it was true. Looks like it is - good data for responding to anti sex worker ppl.
No, I have a really strong distrust for mainstream academia. I don't trust them, I don't trust their competence or their moral sense or their incentive structure.
-
-
And my own community is super good at statistics and have been the first to eviscerate me on all the tiny details in the past years where there's been mistakes in my work. I've learned a huge amount from them and they terrify me more than anything =p
-
At the end of the day, don't be surprised when critique happens about iffy / dubious research methods.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But peer orgs *aren't* mainstream academia (which workers also distrust ). They're groups like SWOP USA, usually staffed by volunteers and current SWs. There's an office in Cali here, would it hurt to get in touch if your goal is really to help? https://swopusa.org/contact/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

it's that the data she's asking for isnt something that's safe on a Google doc, nor is it endorsed by any peer based org. It's just very iffy. As a community people LOVE to lunge onto statistics and warp them. It's just not a good idea, especially atm