Conversation

Replying to
I want to see how much different things affect income - ethnicity, appearance, enjoyment of the job, etc. Safe sex is because my hypothesis was most escorts practice safe sex and I wanted to see if it was true. Looks like it is - good data for responding to anti sex worker ppl.
2
Replying to and
There already is mountains of lit on safer sex practices conducted throughout the past 40 years literally all over the world. You would know this if u were in any way legitimate. Furthermore, just using a google form and a spreadsheet is NOT SECURE ENOUGH. False promises are bad
1
2
Replying to and
Legitimacy is at the crux of good research. You are doing a survey that hold massive negative ramifications for the sex work community and don’t seem to care that we’re going to suffer from your actions. And this doesn’t even qualify for the moniker of replication!
1
2
Replying to and
dang you're taking my lil google form questionairre suuuper seriously here, im also confused about what sort of world you're operating in if a google forms questionnaire can make sex workers suffer so much
1
Replying to and
Fuck yeah I am. I take my community’s welfare seriously. I take ethics seriously. I take soliciting labor of marginalised populations seriously. I, for one, am self-aware. It’s sad you don’t feel the same. But then again, you are a self-confessed unethical researcher so 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️
1
3
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
It's not really that ♥️ it's that the data she's asking for isnt something that's safe on a Google doc, nor is it endorsed by any peer based org. It's just very iffy. As a community people LOVE to lunge onto statistics and warp them. It's just not a good idea, especially atm
2
1
I agree that statistics are really dangerous, as in easily warped, taken out of context, read to mean things they don't actually indicate. I try to keep this in mind and be really open about data limitations whenever I talk about any results from my surveys.
2