Most folks have only ever taken online tests, which are crap, and based on random interpretations of the actual MBTI. Even the official test that you pay to get done, in person, from the MBTI folks, is pretty inaccurate. So almost no one is typed accurately.
-
-
Replying to @thewiseturtle @Aella_Girl
This is more evidence for what I'm saying.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jq78R @Aella_Girl
I'm not sure what you mean. The categories of the MBTI are very useful, but only if you actually are using them, and not looking at some random "fake news" silliness. I suggest the original book Gifts Differing, if you really want to learn about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thewiseturtle @Aella_Girl
If a 200 question-aire gets you pseudoscience, so does 3 anecdotes and an armchair psychologist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jq78R @thewiseturtle
Mbti has limitations, but is great if you actually know how it works and don't do pop tests online. I'm INTP, very strongly.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Jq78R @Aella_Girl
Also, I'm not guessing. I'm categorizing based on over a decade of work in this field. Personality types are a large part of my research. Here is a breakdown of the MBTI as it relates to the DSM:pic.twitter.com/VQpAfiyuYZ
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The polarities boil down to risk-aversion/input-needs focus vs. novelty-seeking/output-needs in 4 basic evolutionary brain regions: motor cortex, limbic system, neocortex, and prefrontal cortex. Which are, respectively, physical, emotional, intellectual, and philosophical.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thewiseturtle @Jq78R
If this was in Jung's original design (the brain thing) then that's news to me, do you have a link to his writing on that? Did they even know about brain regions like that at the time?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Aella_Girl @Jq78R
This isn't Jung. This is specifically the MBTI, which was an update of Jung's stuff. And I've updated the MBTI to include modern neurology, psychology, and developmental theories from everyone I could find. (Ken Wilbur, Spiral Dynamics, Maslow, Elizabet Satouris, me, etc.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
oh so this isn't mbti this is like you trying to make all the systems overlap with each other
-
-
Replying to @Aella_Girl @Jq78R
I'm using the MBTI. There is no Ti Se, etc in the MBTI. Only the four categories with two dimensions.pic.twitter.com/GK9RTHbiNe
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.