This is more evidence for what I'm saying.
Conversation
I'm not sure what you mean.
The categories of the MBTI are very useful, but only if you actually are using them, and not looking at some random "fake news" silliness.
I suggest the original book Gifts Differing, if you really want to learn about it.
1
1
If a 200 question-aire gets you pseudoscience, so does 3 anecdotes and an armchair psychologist.
1
Mbti has limitations, but is great if you actually know how it works and don't do pop tests online.
I'm INTP, very strongly.
3
1
Also, I'm not guessing. I'm categorizing based on over a decade of work in this field.
Personality types are a large part of my research.
Here is a breakdown of the MBTI as it relates to the DSM:
2
There is no "right" or "wrong" in this work. Only more or less effective categorization.
Aella Girl's categorization is not effective in helping her understand herself well. Which is why she's more confused about why she thinks and feels the way she does than is necessary.
2
No, I'm definitely INTP? Assuming you think I'm self classifying wrong; I've read a few books on it as well as some Jung. I know the goal-orientedness I described is not very INTP, which is partially why it's weird; the rest of me is extremely flexible/relaxed.
3
1
The relaxation is likely your Thinking brain design: novelty seeking in the intellectual sphere. T types are curious and experimental and creative when it comes to ideas.
The IST absolutely explains your love of surveys on Twitter: detailed (S) experimental (T) research (I).
1