I started reading Principles for Managing Big Debt Crises, and it makes a strong case that despite the moral hazard of supporting failing institutions that made bad calls, it's super important for mitigating financial collapse across the board
Yeah, if an institution couldn't fail in any circumstance it does seem like they'd do riskier things
If bailouts are conditional on some sort of greater crisis, does that still seem not worth it?
I think so? I guess it depends on how much corporations would operate differently if they knew for a fact they would just disintegrate if something really bad happened. I don't know a ton but I assume they'd build more robust backup plans.
If it turned out that bailouts were the thing that helped reverse a severe economic downturn, I think I'd take the bad incentives it puts on institutions
Bailouts should probably be restricted to individuals (like families that temporarily cannot pay rent) and essential businesses that are expensive to rebuild from the ground up (eg airlines)?
Seems like a resolution could be making a distinction between the company and the infrastructure. Is there a way to make it so that the company (currently) running the port can fail, but the port itself cannot?