I started reading Principles for Managing Big Debt Crises, and it makes a strong case that despite the moral hazard of supporting failing institutions that made bad calls, it's super important for mitigating financial collapse across the board
Yeah, if an institution couldn't fail in any circumstance it does seem like they'd do riskier things
If bailouts are conditional on some sort of greater crisis, does that still seem not worth it?
I think so? I guess it depends on how much corporations would operate differently if they knew for a fact they would just disintegrate if something really bad happened. I don't know a ton but I assume they'd build more robust backup plans.