Conversation

Aella
@Aella_Girl
Years ago, I watched zeitgeist. They presented a very compelling argument for 9/11 being an inside job - why did the safeguards fail? What about building 7? Etc. I was like, damn. This is extremely convincing. But the second section was about the bible, and the bible is probably-
14
122
EricArrrrr
@OakPaul
Replying to
@Aella_Girl
I don't think that a government conspiracy that would require so many people in on some aspect of the plan could possibly stay a secret. The government simply isn't capable of covering up something so significant. The conspiracists assume a degree of competence that doesn't exist
1
5
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
John Zambri
@Zambrijc
Yes. The people required to develop a bomb is not the same as the number of people required to execute a 911 style attack, so apples and oranges, but please continue...
1
2
Aella
@Aella_Girl
Replying to
@Zambrijc
and
@OakPaul
While your delivery is a bit harsh, I generally agree. Usually the more people/visibility a conspiracy theory requires, the more skeptical I am of it. Conspiracy theories which require a relatively small number of people to pull off and are designed to stay invisible, yeah maybe.
5
Likes
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show