Years ago, I watched zeitgeist. They presented a very compelling argument for 9/11 being an inside job - why did the safeguards fail? What about building 7? Etc. I was like, damn. This is extremely convincing. But the second section was about the bible, and the bible is probably-
-
-
Their 9/11 argument. If they were gonna be so uncharitable with something I knew about, I couldn't trust them with other things. This is how I feel with a lot of popular narratives around oppression, privilege, trauma, etc. I find the narrative flawed for a subset I know a lot-
Show this thread -
about (woman raised in extreme subculture of patriarchy), and so I just don't trust the narratives people use about all the other stuff, even though it seems sensible enough at it's surface to draw in large support.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What that interpretation does is put seemingly random, unrelated things in a common context. That is the most powerful argument I can imagine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You ought to watch some public speeches by Richard Carrier,PhD. He's a religious scholar, and formerly Christian himself. His studies have led to the realization of aspects that has been collectively missed by the establishment & expert blind-sightedness. Hard to deny his work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.