"Of course you'd think that, you're X. Y people agree with me."
"Actually, I'm not X, I'm Y"
"Then you're a traitor to your kind/that doesn't count/you aren't Y enough"
Is there a term for this kind of conversational fallacy?
Conversation
Replying to
If Y is something about your identity that you don’t choose, like skin color, this sounds like some variation of identity politics, where your thinking is expected and required to be determined by Y.
Replying to
Tribalism, I'd recommend listening to the work of Johnathan Haidt if you want to explore it more. He's at the forefront of the investigation into the matter.
1
Replying to
I don’t know if there’s a formal term for it but, it appears to come from a place of delusional self entitlement with a propensity towards judgmentalism.
Replying to
Several impolite ones, yes.
(Genetic fallacy, then appeal to purity. I don't know that there's a name for the combo.)
1










